Dear Reader/Subscriber … Yes You!

In my last post I responded to an award nomination. It asked that I include links to  a small number of blogs. I feel that this is unfair. Let me explain.

I subscribe to literally hundreds of blogs. Every time that I turn on my computer there is always something thought provoking or entertaining to read.

Among other things, I can clearly claim that it is the inspiration, desperation?, need, ability, and desire of all the bloggers that I read that inspires me to keep writing. That you read this blog is my inspiration to continue, though not the only inspiration. I write also because I need the outlet and am very grateful that you find it of some worth.

Thank you all, very much.

I mean that  ( some lyrics if you want )

 

 

I’ve Been Nominated For An Award … I Think.

I have never been nominated for an award for my blogging, until now, so I am unsure how to feel. I will simply reply as directed for this to see what, if anything, might become of it. I have to say that I’m grateful.

Here’s the link to the blogs that trace back the nomination.  The Corruption  and Faint Signal  with a special thank you to Faint Signal.

I appreciate all kinds of different writers. Those who bare our emotions deserve special consideration and patronage. It is the writers from our pasts who have bared our inner feelings which inspire us today. At the edge of pornography and profanity are the very thing that occupy our minds most often and with the strongest influences. To ignore them when presented is itself a profanity. So it is that being nominated by a writer (Faint Signal) who plays in such spaces like a kid in a playground that I shall comply with the award rules. Enjoy

The ten question I must answer:

1. Your favourite colour = various shades and hues of purple

2. Your favourite animal = Wild ones, tame ones, all of them I think. Check some BBC for natural world info.

3. Your favourite non-alcoholic drink = Coffee

4. Facebook or Twitter = Twitter is in the sidebar, Facebook? What’s that?

5. Your favourite pattern = Artificial Intelligence

6. Do you prefer getting or giving presents = Giving

7. Your favourite number = Pi

8. Your favourite day of the week = today

9. Your favourite flower = is the one that is in bloom, or orchids.

10. What is your passion = Computing, AI, robots, learning, writing, being … strong emphasis on that last one

I want to add one here, not officially of course.

11. What is your favourite sound. – Mine is anything with the word metal in the genre name, the hammer dolcimer, the haprsichord, and on occasion the bagpipes. The last three deserve someone to wire them up and run them through a synthesizer setup and let the house fall where it may.

My personal nominees are as follows (In no particular order):

Dauson Stimpson-Gagnon

The Diary Of Kiki Kickass – though she probably will not answer on this one, no vamps involved?

Why Evolution Is True

Jefferly.com

BUGGING MO’S

dictaobscura

Dead Wild Roses

robin claire

karls flowers

Wait, stop right there.

or this link with better audio

You know what, I could go on with this for a long time. I find so many good writers that it is not fair to simply list a few. Please look at my comments on the About page or others. There you will find many people who have something that is not only interesting to say, they will probably make you think … the very point of writing in my opinion. Find the links, enjoy them all.

The rules are required to be posted with the answers above:

Here are the rules:

1. Provide a link and thank the blogger who nominated you for this award.

2. Answer 10 questions.

3. Nominate 10-12 blogs that you find a joy to read.

4. Provide links to these nominated blogs and kindly let the recipients know that they have been nominated.

5. Include the award logo within your blog post.

Things Believers Say – Part 2

I’m going to take this unashamedly from this blogger’s post without more than the blog name as I truly feel no obligation to advertise for it. The blog post is titled: “Christianity and Psychotherapy…” If you really want to read it, you can find it on WordPress.com.  That said, lets get into it.

The ‘Things Believers Say’ series of posts here on this blog are all about things that I see them write or say that is clearly wrong and breathtakingly inane. All I want to do is point them out and talk briefly why they are wrong. No, this will not save us from global warming or create world peace, but it is useful to be aware of such caustic ideas which run amok in our societies.

Given the title you can guess this blogger is a Christian psychotherapist. Sounds safe enough, right? Wrong.  At first, we can’t really say that anything is wrong with the blogger saying this:

Having said that, this article is mainly a warning for all of my brothers and sisters in Christ; do NOT go to a psychologist, counselor, therapist, etc… who is not a believer.

Fairly quickly this blogger shows that they are not a good therapist with this little missive: (emphasis is mine)

Any therapist worth going to will bring up your religious and spiritual beliefs in therapy, and no matter how (or if) they try to fight it, their beliefs WILL change how they choose to do therapy and how they see your faith impacting your life.

What they mean is that to be a good therapist your belief or non-belief in a god is essential to how you assist the patient AND their belief or non-belief is necessarily a part of the therapy. In other words, there is no therapy without a discussion of faith if you go to a ‘good therapist’ … hmmmm

That begs the question from the six year old in the back: “If your god answers prayers, why do you need a psychologist?”

Do they actually mean that non-believers cannot help anyone but non-believers? Yes, yes they do.

There is also little doubt that atheists or agnostic therapists, regardless of their past beliefs, will be incapable of sufficiently connecting with a believer in the therapeutic relationship.

That’s right, only the believer can assist a believer with their therapy. Conversely, a believer cannot assist a non-believer. What is being said here is that you SHOULD discriminate in which therapist you seek help from based on their religious beliefs. Sounds a bit fishy doesn’t it? This sounds very much like a therapist that would not give assistance to a non-believer and this is a form of discrimination that is on very thin ice according to news reported by the LA Times.

At best, there will simply be a disconnect, at worst the therapist would harbor a negative view of the patient’s religious beliefs, oftentimes believing any and all spiritual beliefs to be detrimental or mental defenses that need changing.

Well, lets go back to the six year old. If your beliefs are important to you and have not helped you, why is it impossible that they are the source of your problems?

The adult question is “how then do you counsel the adult victim of a paedophile priest?”

Then there is this kicker:

Take marriage for example; there is no absolute and sure grounds for trying to save an ailing marriage outside of God’s will.  Meaning, an unbelieving therapist is a threat to a believer’s marriage if there is trouble in the marital relationship because outside of God, and Jesus, there are no absolute, unchanging, unwavering reasons why a marriage should be saved even if people within the marriage are having a rough time of it.  Instead of offering aid and healing to the marriage itself, there is the potential that an unbelieving therapist could add more poison to a relationship, or push one party to get a divorce for their own “mental health.”

That’s right kiddos, this psychologist would insist that you stay with your abusive partner. So first your god tells you to piss off, then this psychologist is going to tell you to be a good spouse, pray harder, and buck up to save the marriage. If your getting an itch to grab some rotten tomatoes and go looking for this psychologist’s office… I wouldn’t blame you.

…God desires our mental health to be seen to, just as much as our physical health, and that mental and physical health impacts spiritual health as well.

This, remember, is the very same god that allows pastors to rape teens, priests to rape children, and the faithful to burn witches on the African continent. He is ALL about your mental and physical health. A sure sign of this is the number of ‘crimes’ he deems worthy of death.

Where does that leave an atheist or non-believer who needs help?

Atheist Revolution has a page about this which might be useful.

For the atheist who needs a mental health professional, psychologist or counselor, I offer the following recommendations:

  • When first calling to schedule an appointment, inquire about the provider’s degree and the institution from where the degree was obtained.
  • If the provider is an LPC, ask directly whether this person provides “Christian counseling.” If so, move on. You are not asking whether the counselor is Christian but whether they provide “Christian counseling.” This is an important difference and one which you are well advised to heed.
  • View the initial appointment as an opportunity to evaluate the provider. If you do not feel comfortable for any reason, ask for a referral and move on. Reputable providers tend to encourage this sort of evaluation – they want to make sure they can be helpful to you and that you feel comfortable with them.
  • Recognize that many mental health professionals will ask, on questionnaires or in person, something about your religious affiliation or the importance of spirituality in your life. They tend to do this to help understand your worldview and not to convert you. However, if the provider should make disparaging comments about your lack of religious participation, spirituality, and the like, move on. This represents a violation of the provider’s own professional ethics, and you deserve better.
  • If you are seeking therapy and want to make sure that your provider will utilize scientifically-sound methods, look for someone who provides cognitive-behavioral therapy. Of all the therapeutic modalities, it has been researched the most extensively and has the most evidence supporting its efficacy.

 

 

 

Homosexuality: It's time to accept reality

Reblogged from Dokowe Samuel's Blog:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

I write this to generate awareness. Below are rebuttals to a few arguments against legalizing homosexuality in Zambia.

What is homosexuality?
Homosexuality is not a sin or immoral by any way. Homosexuals are just people attracted to members of the same-sex. To you, homosexuality may appear odd, but to them, it is completely natural.

HOMOPHOBIC ARGUMENT #1 -"HOMOSEXUALITY IS A CHOICE!"

Read more… 1,519 more words

There are things that make me angry (yes, an angry atheist) and I often think I should sit down and write about it but then I stumble upon a really well written piece which covers all that I wanted to. In such cases I think it better to simply point my readers to the very information that I wanted to share and of course let them find a new blogger into the bargain. Let it be said "The only unnatural sexual orientation for mammals is celebacy". No matter when or where you lived as a human, approximately 10% (or more) of the people around have not been heterosexual in orientation. Time for the world to get over it. The world did not crumble when they were quiet about it and it won't crumble if they are given the equal status they richly deserve. To deny non-heterosexuals equal status is a crime against humanity in my view.

Fear – Is It Fear That Forms Your World?

Lately I seem to be trying to point out the amazing capabilities of the human brain. It is a complex thing with which we build a model of the universe around us and through this model we evaluate all the sensory data that we receive. Our ability to manipulate and use such a model is what makes us so adaptable and so capable.

In fact, we perceive ourselves to exist inside the model of the universe that we use. More importantly, we can remake that model at will in response to random thoughts (creativity) or external information (senses, blogs, books, tv etc.). That is to say that we live in one of billions of billions of possible universes. In your model of the universe it may be possible for ghosts to exist but when we exchange information and compare notes, you might decide to remake your model of the universe such that it does not include the existence of ghosts. Nothing about the physical world/universe changed. The only thing that changed was how you decide to model the universe that you perceive yourself to exist in.

We mammals (especially humans) have a natural tendency to try to validate aspects of our model of the universe which have no explanation, often settling on explanations which may not be true but which work well enough to keep us alive. The more information that we have and the more information that we share, the more accurate our model of the universe becomes. In short, this is basically how science works. We have no guarantee that the explanation is absolutely true but we can refine that explanation over time until there is no reason left to doubt the explanation.

The idea that gods can exist is one that is without any credible evidence. All the evidence which is offered is or relies on anecdotal evidence. Such evidence is suspect and in every part of the believer’s life they will be suspect of claims without evidence – except for those things they want to be true about their model of the universe.

It takes effort to explain how the brain can confuse itself, both for good and bad, but there are people who have gone to such lengths to explain why and how the brain can cause positive reinforcement of invalid aspects of our model of the universe. This happens largely through lack of information. With that, I’ll ask you to watch these videos.

and part 2

There are natural reasons that our brains might convince us that our shared model of the universe is not quite right. This video shows how perception changes understanding of our model, and how we can change our model to match what we perceived – whether it is real or not.

 

Now, let us visit with William of Occam:

 

 

While there is evidence that our brains can construct the universe model that we think we live in, there is no reason to add extra bits of explanation which have no explanation themselves.

So to expect a person to believe in a god, one need necessarily explain why it is that the human brain does not explain your beliefs in the first place. That is to say; If your notion has no credible evidence there is little if any reason to think it more than a trick of the brain, a misunderstanding, or simply confusion borne of lack of knowledge.

The assertion that gods can exist is without credible evidence.

What I Want for Christmas: Not a Damn Thing

Reblogged from Whatever:

Another in my series of "post once, refer people to later" entries, this time on gift giving:

For a number of years, I've told people who have been thinking of getting me something for Christmas or whatever holiday excuse they have for gift giving that I'd simply prefer they not get me anything at all. The reaction to this often ranges from confusion (i.e., how can you not want gifts?) to exasperation that my insincere "no, no, you don't have to get me anything..." ways just means they will have to be extra crafty in getting me a gift, since I'm not helping them by hinting at what I want.

Read more… 1,399 more words

It's time to start thinking about gifts again... NOT Read this post and then hear me say "yeah, what he said"

Sam Harris: Riding the Philosophic Short Bus

Reblogged from Eric Hyde's Blog:

Click to visit the original post

To begin, I would like to tip my hat to Sam Harris. He is an all-star neuroscientist and fantastic author and speaker, but more than that, he’s brave!

Brave? Yes, brave.

Any scientist willing to commit to a strict philosophical naturalism and not allow the element of human thought to escape its clutches has attempted something noble—consistency; something truly rare these days.

Read more… 987 more words

Here you go. I wish I'd been able to think it through so clearly as this. Enjoy... Even Mr Harris should enjoy this one.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 339 other followers

%d bloggers like this: